CarwilBJ's avatarCarwilBJ's Twitter Archive—№ 37,236

              1. Colombia's non-governmental Misión de Observación Electoral (Electoral Observer Mission) has reviewed available evidence posted by the Venezuelan opposition, finding them internally consistent and supportive of a victory by Eduardo González. moe.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/20240802-Pasos-y-hallazgos-resultados-Venezuela-2024.-Vff.pdf
            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
              MOE Colombia has run mass observation missions of Colombian elections since 2006, fielding over 2600 observers to monitor electoral integrity.
          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
            The mission reviewed data posted online by the opposition at resultadosconvzla.com, which presents aggregated totals as well as scanned receipts for each voting table.
            oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their APIoh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
          The MOE reviewed the posted actas by scanning them directly and by reading the embedded QR codes, finding them consistent. A manual review of 100 actas found no duplicate signatures.
          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        Due to image quality, the scans resolved for 21,952 actas, less than the 24,532 posted online, and 73.1% of the national total of 30,026. The National Electoral Court has published none of these, despite its legal obligations.
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      MOE found that that its dataset was broadly consistent with the opposition's count of the 24,532 actas it has published, including on levels of participation.
  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
    Mathematically, it is INconsistent with the totals published by the National Electoral Court, awarding the presidency to Maduro.
    oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      The data table compares the MOE's results with the Venezuelan National Electoral Court. Edmundo González leads 6.39M to 2.89M votes by the former count; Nicolás Maduro leads 6.41M to 5.33M in the latter.
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        Since the CNE purports to be nearly complete, this means that some González votes appearing on the data sheets have not been counted by the CNE. Unless the data sheets are themselves fake, this requires affirmative explanation from the court.
        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
          Conversely, the MOE analysts note that the apparent lack of Maduro votes in the CNE's count could not come from the different number of voting tables counted. Since 3.5M vote gap exceeds the number of uncounted votes, only fraud on one side or the other can explain.
          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
            Much of the MOE report is devoted to totals at various levels: municipal, provincial, state. The lack of any such breakdown from the CNE is glaring and the MOE highlights this.
            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
              MOE Conclusion: "To be able to perform a technically adequate analysis, it's necessary for the CNE or the Supreme Court to permit an integral audit of the voting, transmission and consolidation of information and of electoral results."
              1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                MOE is on Twitter at @moecolombia. Post on the report here: x.com/moecolombia/status/1819765170748719339