CarwilBJ’s avatarCarwilBJ’s Twitter Archive—№ 32,762

                    1. Very smart thread on the often-invisible labor anarchists perform in larger movements. 👇🏾 @magpiekilljoy/1558439158439354369
                  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                    Four resonant thoughts from something I wrote about the 2003 antiwar mobilizations in the SF Bay Area… scribd.com/document/65408090/Shattering-Consensus-and-Disrupting-Downtown-New-Urban-Resistance-to-War-and-Empire
                1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                  1. Quite simply, a belief that society needs long term, fundamental change inspires people to stick with the tedious work of calling allies, setting up voicemail, and hosting meetings.
              1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                Revolutionary traditions…offer a strategic narrative of ways to do something more than endlessly confront the system’s wars, atrocities and disasters. They envision a time when we not only challenge the cruelties of state power, but when we unmake, remake, or reclaim that power.
            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
              2. Revolutionary politics and activist traditions provided alternatives to despair and defeat as established systems of power (Congress, street lobbying, the United Nations, and the dissenting imperial powers of Europe) acquiesced in or failed to prevent the invasion.
          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
            3. Totally seconding what @magpiekilljoy wrote about Portland… "anarchist organizing methods underlay the structure … Affinity groups, networked through spokescouncils based on consensus, and committed to both autonomy and solidarity carried out direct action."
        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
          4. The obvious issues around power and agendas raised by the differences between those doing the work of organizing and [the larger numbers of people] who opposed the war are real.
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        I would argue that they are lessened by an open organizing structure, direct democracy, and the possibilities of autonomy within solidarity. Conversely, closed or hierarchical organizing structures tend to amplify these problems.
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      We revolutionaries who want a democratic society have a special obligation to check ourselves on seizing power while expressing ourselves brilliantly in calling for more than minor, temporary changes.
  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
    P.S. I had a lot of hardworking fun writing several pages bridging the anarchist/socialist/Marxist/Third World Communist divides into a single section on "revolutionaries." The desire to do so was born of material cooperation in the streets.
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      "This paragraph attempts the near-impossible task of remaining neutral on the question of whether power is to be taken or destroyed, seized or exercised. Bear with me."
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        For those seeking context… "We Interrupt This Empire" documents the Bay Area antiwar mobilization in 2003: archive.org/details/we_interrupt_this_empire "Shutdown: The Rise and Fall of Direct Action to Stop the War" tells a more inside story: vimeo.com/57710595