-
In light of yet another nuclear renaissance story, here's a quick update on nuclear power. Two areas of bad news, one of uncertainty, and spectacular improvements of the alternatives: renewables and storage.
-
Nuclear bad news 1: massive cost overruns and delays continue at only conventional nuclear power plants under construction in the USA.
-
The Vogtle 3 and 4 reactors were delayed again. These two conventional reactors were started in 2013 and will cost at least $30.34 billion. world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Further-delay-in-startup-of-Vogtle-AP1000s
-
The nuclear renaissance was pitched to the public at a $4 billion/gigawatt reactor price point, so we're now approaching a 4x cost.
-
Nuclear bad news 2: Small modular reactors, pitched as a low-waste future version of nuclear power, are actually likely to compound nuclear waste, according to a peer-reviewed analysis. arstechnica.com/science/2022/06/smaller-reactors-may-still-have-a-big-nuclear-waste-problem/
-
SMRs have some economic problems as well. arstechnica.com/science/2020/11/first-major-modular-nuclear-project-having-difficulty-retaining-backers/
-
A balanced look at the leading SMR project, which promises a reactor in 2029. Far too early to tell if they will meet their cost promises. utilitydive.com/news/nuscale-makes-public-debut-but-requires-a-lot-of-financing-to-launch-smal/624568/
-
Here's an informed skeptical take from Amory Lovins on just how long that can last. energyintel.com/00000180-f7a8-d67b-a3cd-f7faad650000m
-
Meanwhile the costs of solar and wind power continue to plunge and both distributed sourcing and battery storage provide an alternative to the "baseload" power nuclear backers claim is necessary.
-
As I've said before, activist effort is far better spent on retiring coal and gas plants than nuclear ones right now, but there's no real case for a nuclear renaissance.

