-
Laura Graham & Beth Conklin are giving a dual voice update on the advocacy of indigenous peoples in Brazil, a quarter century after their landmark article "The Shifting Middle Ground" #AAA2021Baltimore
-
Their argument: the three major weaknesses/vulnerabilities they identified in 1995 have been overcome in dramatic fashion.
-
Those weaknesses were: An "authenticity trap" forcing representatives to "be pure and poor" Political precarity surrounding small number of charismatic male activists Vulnerability to limited sources of funding
-
Instead, they see hundreds of political associations of indigenous peoples, often led by a more gender-balanced, much better-educated generation of Indigenous leaders who allow movements to speak, lobby, and legally represent themselves.
-
Illustrative examples: Eloy Terena wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/interview-eloy-terena-indigenous-land-rights-activist-brazil Txai Suruí nytimes.com/2021/11/01/world/americas/cop26-indigenous-txai-surui.html
-
New Indigenous institutions, particularly: Indigenous-run media, Acampamento Terra Livre, an annual mass encampament in Brasilia, & Articulação dos Povos Indígenas do Brasil
-
Conclusion: "a kind of rhizomal reslience that might promise hope for the future"