-
If your model of US imperial power predicted that the United States would reject Arce's 2020 election and Castillo's 2021 election, consider revising it. (thread)
-
US foreign policy has a preference for governments that lean right, but that has always been tempered by a need for local legitimacy, for allies who will predictably stay in power, and for maintaining influence with whoever the current government is.
-
The US lacks the willingness to overturn elections that run overwhelmingly against it, like Bolivia 2020.
-
The US may also find figures like Keiko Fujimori to be weighted down with historical baggage and excessive corruption.
-
If the covert diplomatic record around the Pinochet coup is any clue, US Embassies are often flooded with offers of coups and plots, most of which are unlikely to succeed.
-
Even under Kissinger, they had to say "no" most of the time.
-
And sometimes, as Carter-era diplomatic cables from Bolivia reveal, the US takes a stand against military coups, as both immoral and destabilizing.
-
If we understand the USA as a hegemonic, imperial, and capitalist power, capable of planning for the medium- and long-term, it makes sense that it can choose to be less impulsive than its would-be proxies…
-
… capable of investing in winning the next election rather than overthrowing the current one, and capable of working with governments it doesn't like when they have popular legitimacy.