CarwilBJ’s avatarCarwilBJ’s Twitter Archive—№ 28,205

  1. Email chain reveals that Áñez government started criminal investigation of MIT researchers @Master0fNull @JohnCuriel14 over their statistical analysis of 2019 Bolivian election. @theintercept/1389631047512567808
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      The Bolivian foreign ministry had denied suggestions that such a case would be opened in March 2020. Evidently the government changed course. google.com/amp/s/pruebas.la-razon.bo/nacional/2020/03/05/la-cancilleria-descarta-juicio-contra-autores-del-analisis-que-cuestiona-el-fraude-electoral/%3famp=1
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        We're many steps deep into the judicialization of Bolivian politics, but the criminal investigation of foreign observers is particularly obnoxious.
        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
          (This point also applies to threats to prosecute the OAS audit team and Almagro for his words, FWIW.)
          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
            Academics and journalists rightly expect the US government to kick this kind of investigation aside.
            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
              With that said, my cynical eyes don't read the DOJ correspondence here as especially threatening…
              1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                The same letter being selectively screencapped says that the DOJ will accept authenticating the authorship of a public report in lieu of an interview. And that is what Williams does in response.
                1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                  It's the earlier request for an interview in support of the Bolivian (or absurdly, Paraguayan) investigation that feels like US government complicity with an attack on free speech.
                  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                    Curiel and Williams were reasonably viewing that correspondence in the most hostile light possible.
                    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                      Also worth asking whether the US DOJ slow-walked this request until Áñez was voted out, or whether some Áñez official started pressing them in October.
                      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                        Trump State Department support for Áñez after the coup remains clear. Before the coup, unproven. This troubling episode doesn't really clarify that, contra the Intercept reporting.