CarwilBJ’s avatarCarwilBJ’s Twitter Archive—№ 27,880

                                              1. A recurring problem in Bolivia is one-eye-shut perspectives where (many external or pro-MAS) left observers only mention abuses by the right, and (many external or anti-MAS) right observers only mention abuses by the MAS. The solution is a more complete accounting. (thread) @jderpic/1377063613106642945
                                            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                                              Mirror-image patterns of denial, a staple of social media spaces like this one and increasingly of the Bolivian mass media, do not imply symmetric patterns of violence and abuse. We have to investigate instead.
                                          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                                            In the 2019 Bolivian crisis, property destruction began on October 21 with the burning of electoral offices, non-lethal police violence and inter-protester violence began later in October, and deadly acts began on October 29. First deadly state violence was after Evo's ouster.
                                        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                                          Here's a table of the 38 people killed in the crisis. There were five fatalities caused before Evo resigned; pro-MAS protesters were responsible for the first four.
                                          oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
                                      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                                        Two important things how the Morales gov't handled the crisis… It essentially forbid the security forces from using lethal force. And it made prompt arrests in the cases of the three known deaths before November 10.
                                    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                                      Looking more closely, the beating death of Julio Llanos was caused on October 29, but he was still hospitalized when Evo resigned. The gov't failed to find and prosecute the MAS supporters who beat him.
                                  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                                    On the other hand, prosecutors charged and jailed a cluster of MAS politicians, activists, and associates for the shootings in Montero on October 30.
                                1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                                  And it promptly arrested presumed perpetrators of the death of Limbert Guzman. These cases stalled somewhat under the Áñez government.
                              1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                                The death of Sebastián Moro, who was injured by an anti-MAS crowd the day before his fatal assault by unknown parties, was too late for the Morales government to investigate. woborders.blog/2020/04/17/sebastian-moro-death/
                            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                              There was also potentially deadly violence: protesters in anti-MAS caravans from Potosí and Sucre (on the road to protest in La Paz) were taken captive and beaten on November 9, and attacked by sharpshooters on November 10, wounding at least six.
                          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                            In parallel to that pro-MAS violence, anti-MAS partisans in Montero, Cochabamba and elsewhere assaulted opponents and burnt out buildings. During the police mutiny, this escalated further.
                        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                          Despite a barrage of arrests of MAS activists, the Áñez government seems to have spent little effort on the deaths in Montero, Cochabamba, and La Paz, nor on finding the sharpshooters and kidnappers of November 9/10.
                      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                        In summary (of the pre-ouster violence): The Morales government disavowed military force vs the anti-fraud movement or the police mutiny. It detained some pro-MAS violent actors, but pro-MAS violence shocked the country and contributed to the demand for Evo Morales to resign.
                    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                      Anti-MAS arson and violence began on October 21, when it literally burned ballots, and continued through at least November 10, burning politicians' homes and party offices. But no one died til Sebastian Moro.
                  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                    The above is a minor update from this analysis. After Evo's ouster, the violence got much worse, and responsibility shifted to the security forces and the interim government.
                1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                  In January 2020, I wrote up a summary of all the deaths during the crisis here. woborders.blog/2020/01/04/2019-crisis-deaths-analysis/ A number of unknowns have been filled in since then, and two more died from wounds at Sacaba and Senkata, but it covers the sequence.
              1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                During the two-day military interregnum, there were two clusters of deaths. In El Alto, La Paz, and Cochabamba, pro-MAS demonstrators attacked police installations and looted. The security forces confronted them and other pro-MAS crowds.
            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
              Two police officers were fatally wounded (motorcycle crash amid confrontation; beating) in La Paz/El Alto. Separately, troops shot 2-3 civilians in La Paz and chased another one to his death.
              oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
            In Cochabamba, two more were killed, as three-sided MAS / RJC / security forces clashes raged. This was a chaotic time, but a longstanding pattern of police/military overkill of unthreatening protesters and bystanders was already activated in La Paz.
        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
          Then, as the military executed orders to "pacify the country" they brought deadly force to scenes of confrontation in Betanzos, Montero, and Yapacaní, killing one in each place on November 12–13.
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        By Bolivian standards, this a lot of deadly state force: 5 to 8 killings in three days. It looks like the predictable result of using the military for crowd control, something that was restricted in 2004.
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      Part three of the crisis begins with the Áñez presidency (Nov 12) and her decree authorizing national "pacification" through deadly force on November 15. This would be deadlier than the rest.
  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
    Here's the summary of death during the crisis again. This is the most recent graphic, including deaths after-the-fact from Sacaba and Senkata. Red lines indicate ouster of Morales, inauguration of Áñez
    oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      Áñez may have either authorized or failed to limit the November 12-13 crackdown, but she bears full responsibility for the November 15 and 19 massacres.
      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their APIoh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        In the aftermath of the Sacaba and Senkata massacres, there have been ludicrous allegations that the protesters "shot one another" or were engaged in "terrorist" acts justifying their deaths.
        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
          In fact, negotiated de-escalations of protests occurred in the hours prior to each massacre. Abundant evidence of military firing was always there. And there was never a substantive risk of a gas explosion at Senkata.
          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
              Still shocking to me is the right-wing narrative that these events were essentially MAS-orchestrated massacres, regardless of who fired the shots. @edamsoft/1377322549873238017