CarwilBJ’s avatarCarwilBJ’s Twitter Archive—№ 27,602

      1. I understand that SpaceX's development strategy is incremental success while wrecking many inexpensive prototypes, but… @guardianscience/1367302030566379523
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +2 🙂
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      They will have to compensate for these explosions with a LOT of faultless flying to get their empirical failure rate down to acceptable levels for human spaceflight.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
    I mean these are the people whose long-term business plan is: sell your home and fly with us to Mars. That plan cannot survive a 1% risk of death on impact.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -4 🙁
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      "Move fast and break things" and "passenger spaceflight" may be incompatible concepts.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 9 Favorites Mood 0
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        Supposing that 37% gravity, high surface wind, subzero temperatures, and a different atmospheric composition are relevant variables, how exactly does one apply this approach to landing on Mars? By sending a dozen prototypes?
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood 0