-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson If jumping to a conclusion about a one's opponent's speech pattern was disqualifying, then Twitter is a qualification graveyard all around.Permalink On twitter.com
❤️ 2 Favorites Mood 0
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson Re-reading to attempt to debug the pointless aggression loop… 1. K: "Tata" is Q not M-T. J has no clue. 2. B: Yes. 3. D: "Tata" is M-T too. 4. B: Yes, "Tata" in M-T, but also "-iya," "ticachica"On twitter.com
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson 5. D: You didn't apologize for denigrating M-T culture; you ought to be ashamed of yourself. 6. B: I'm trying to respond respectfully… 7. J: B = US white man, this is peak colonialism. 8. C: B != peak colonialism, 28 yrs supporting indigenous.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson 9. D: C is blindly deferential to authority. 10. C: This seem petty. (and Twitter is rotting our brains.) 11. D: B & K were wrong about "T" & M-T! They disqualified themselves. … and are neo-colonialist.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson Oh, I'm unfairly nice to myself: 10a. C: Also, use the Google.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson I still think Twitter is rotting our brains. My proposition is that somewhere between 4 & 8 we pause and start treating each other like human beings with something valuable to say to one another.Permalink On twitter.com