-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson What I see here is something wrong with Twitter, on all sides of the conversation: pettiness.Permalink On twitter.com
Mood -2 🙁
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson I see this loop all the time: 1. read statement one disagrees with. / 2. Seek out a reason to disqualify the speaker instead of the argumentPermalink On twitter.com
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson It's the exact opposite of the Wikipedia principle of Assume Good Faith. And yes, Jhanisse and Devin and Bret and Kathryn all did that to some extent here.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson I'm chiming in, not in defense of authority, but in defense of the clear right to be listened to. In this case, around a person who has put in the time to learn and support.On twitter.com
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson No single linguistic dispute/mistake disqualifies that. And the accusation of colonialism here is either an overgeneralization or cheapens the term.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson Most importantly, if the goal is to bring a our knowledge and experience #onhere, then we should use this space to listen and benefit from that of others, even those we disagree with vehemently.Permalink On twitter.com
-
@db_beaulieu @JhanisseVDaza @bretgustafson My point is about using Google is simply this: an ad hominen attack that runs counter to the person one can readily learn about from searching the person you're attacking is a waste of everyone's time.Permalink On twitter.com