-
@ViscidKonrad @Master0fNull So, I see what you're saying here: 90-95%: CC: 53,213 MAS: 210,523 (4.0x) 95-100%: CC: 50,489 MAS: 166,597 (3.3x)
-
@ViscidKonrad @Master0fNull So we have the same numbers on the table 0-86%: CC: 2,100,493 MAS: 2,417,553 (1.15x) 86-90%: CC: 36,725 MAS: 94,686 (2.6x)
-
@ViscidKonrad @Master0fNull I agree with you that 95% doesn't look like the critical break point in this table's data. And the argument from the auditors that it was seems perplexing in light of these figures.
-
@ViscidKonrad @Master0fNull Conversely, 95% or 97-98% sure looks like a discontinuity here. Do we have a different horizontal axis variable involved?