CarwilBJ’s avatarCarwilBJ’s Twitter Archive—№ 23,985

  1. …in reply to @Master0fNull
    @Master0fNull Headline: "Our research found no reason to suspect fraud." How can you ignore the numerous reasons to suspect fraud listed by all the sources I mentioned? Or not investigate them at all?
    On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood -12 🙁
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      @Master0fNull And it's methodologically problematic to respond to two OAS reports that argue the trend changed suddenly in the last 5% of the official count by running a comparison between the first 84% of the TREP and the final count.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        @Master0fNull If you're verifying or refuting the OAS statistical claims, why don't you analyze the claims in the statistical section of the OAS audit (p. 86-94) instead of just replicating the CEPR study? oas.org/es/sap/deco/Informe-Bolivia-2019/0.1%20Informe%20Final%20-%20Analisis%20de%20Integridad%20Electoral%20Bolivia%202019%20(OSG).pdf
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood 0