CarwilBJ’s avatarCarwilBJ’s Twitter Archive—№ 23,194

    1. This is a great day for linguists to explain conversational implicature. @maggieNYT @poniewozik/1217607865332047881
      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
    W: Do you think a woman can win? S: Trump will weaponize sexism against any woman he faces. S could either be saying no, giving cautionary advice to W, or saying no in an explicitly deniable way. See the first three minutes of this video. youtu.be/3-son3EJTrU
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      At the same time, Sanders flouted reasonableness in his denial that he could possibly have said what millions have speculated in the past year. @AmandaMarcotte/1217431194922516480?s=19