CarwilBJ's avatarCarwilBJ's Twitter Archive—№ 20,917

                1. Ever since I read this piece on Jeffrey Epstein and scientists, I've been contemplating the ideological affinities that made JE's particular sexist, transhumanist madness palatable to people who should know better. nytimes.com/2019/07/31/business/jeffrey-epstein-eugenics.html
                  Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar ♻️ 1 Retweets ❤️ 5 Favorites Mood -3 🙁
              1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                As with Wall Street, Federal prosecutors' offices, political elites, and the ultrarich circles he frequented, scientists need to be asking themselves: What about us made Jeffrey Epstein seem not so disturbing? @onekade
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood -2 🙁
            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
              And a very helpful first step is understanding how scientists often embrace a proto-transhumanism. The field guide for this is Mary Midgley's fascinating _Evolution as a Religion: Strange Hopes and Stranger Fears_.
              oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their APIoh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their APIoh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood +7 🙂
          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
            (though these clips are from Midgley's contemporaneous article "Pi in the Sky," in Third Way, March 1996.)
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood 0
        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
          Jaron Lanier calls the 21st century update of this belief "cybernetic totalism," which he summarizes here (very much as a critic). edge.org/conversation/one-half-a-manifesto
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood -2 🙁
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        "That biology and physics will merge with computer science (becoming biotechnology and nanotechnology), resulting in life and the physical universe becoming mercurial; achieving the supposed nature of computer software. …"
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      "Furthermore, all of this will happen very soon! Since computers are improving so quickly, they will overwhelm all the other cybernetic processes, like people … at some moment when a new "criticality" is achieved- maybe in about the year 2020. …"
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood +4 🙂
  1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
    "… To be a human after that moment will be either impossible or something very different than we now can know."
    On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
      This strikes me (and Midgley, and to a lesser extent Lanier) as murky soup to believe in. Yet apparently a lot of influential media and tech creators bought into this line of argument.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
      1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
        In that context, Jeffrey Epstein's escapist fantasy for the putatively hyperrich / putatively superintelligent male with an infinite genetic lineage thru mass breeding literally didn't freak people out.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood -2 🙁
        1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
          And that's absolutely stunning. It should prompt soul searching about the kinds of emotional rewards that scientists, technologists, and entrepreneur reap from the escapist fantasies of a singular/transhuman future.
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +6 🙂
          1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
            Doubly so for the scientists, because ain't none of this scientifically plausible or intellectually defensible.
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood 0
            1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
              And here's an insider account of how Epstein was sold to scientists as a billionaire who could provide easy access to (presumably adult) women. newrepublic.com/article/154826/jeffrey-epsteins-intellectual-enabler
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood +1 🙂
              1. …in reply to @CarwilBJ
                Wired magazine: "The billionaire child rapist bought his way into an elite crowd of intellectuals that defined the last three decades of science, tech, and culture." wired.com/story/jeffrey-epstein-and-the-power-of-networks/
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo CarwilBJ’s avatar Mood -4 🙁